Skip to main content
ICONS Project: Simulations. Insights. Solutions.
  • Login
  • Search
Menu
  • Education
    • Overview

    • Our Approach
    • Simulation Catalog
    • Instructor Benefits
    • Get Started
    • Register
  • Research
    • Overview

    • Featured Research
    • Think Tanks
    • Universities
    • U.S. Government
  • About ICONS
    • Mission and History
    • ICONSnet
    • People
    • Contact
  • Home
  • Research
  • Overview
By combining advanced simulation methods with an Internet-based platform that supports participation from multiple geographically distributed locations, ICONS can support a wide array of research agendas, including experimental designs.
The ICONSnet simulation platform offers researchers in the social and behavioral sciences a unique environment for their research programs.

The Simulation Research Advantage

The chief advantage of using simulations, as is the case with other experimental approaches, lies in the ability of researchers to control the environment by isolating extraneous factors. Simply put, it allows the researcher to look at the effects of a particular factor by comparing the results of those who were exposed to that factor with those who were unexposed. That is, it allows the researcher to establish causal relationships where direct observation of the environment does not allow for such control. It is this latter quality that accounts for the increasing use of experimental approaches and simulation in social science research designs.

Research Projects Supported

Some of the research areas that have been explored through recent ICONS simulations include:

  • US-China crisis decision making in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Korean Peninsula
  • counter-Da'esh influence operations including examination of biopsychosocially-informed tactics
  • the impact of social media on corporate crisis decision making
  • how decision-maker cognitive complexity influences the choice of options in conflict and crisis
  • the impact of mediator style on negotiation outcomes
  • the choice of appropriate deterrence strategies in gray zone conflict in Eastern Europe

These research projects have involved political scientists, historians, journalists, neuroscientists, linguists, criminologists, and psychologists, as well as a wide group of researchers and analysts from the policy and think tank communities. A variety of supporting methodologies, including social network analysis, survey research, and content analysis have been employed by researchers using ICONSnet in studying communications patterns in negotiation.

Explore Research

Featured Research
Research with Government
Research with Think Tanks
Research with Universities
Research
  • Overview
  • Featured Research
  • Think Tanks
  • Universities
  • U.S. Government

How does it all work?

Watch our Virtual Simulation Tour
  • Education
    • Education Programs Overview
    • Our Approach
    • Simulation Catalog
    • Instructor Benefits
    • Get Started
    • Register
  • Research
    • Research Programs Overview
    • Featured Research
    • Think Tanks
    • Universities
    • U.S. Government
  • About ICONS
    • Mission and History
    • ICONSnet
    • People
    • Contact
  • Connect
    • X (formerly Twitter)
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Phone: Telephone the ICONS Project at (301) 405-4172
      Email: Email the ICONS Project at icons@umd.edu
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
University of Maryland
Technical Support
Privacy Notice
Web Accessibility
© 2010-2025, All rights reserved.